I've now discovered that My Heritage free trees are limited to 250 family members. So very drastic pruning indeed needed for my 5000+ members - the complete tree is uploaded but only 250 people are visible. Presumably that means that record matching is also limited to those 250. The solution is of course a paid subscription - but I'm not sure if I want to go down that road, as I already have paid subscriptions to Ancestry, Find My Past and so on...

Anyone else tried this? I'd love to hear your views.


I was interested to see the announcement of a new record matching new feature on My Heritage - the idea is that it compares your tree to the records on Super Search in order to find matches with records such as newspapers, photos and other online records. And it's free! I haven't tried it yet, but I'm going to upload my tree and see what happens. Only trouble is my tree has so many individuals on it I may need to do some 'tree pruning' to make it manageable.

Anyone else tried it?


I'm planning my next visit to The National Archives at Kew next week. I seem to have a somewhat eclectic list of things I need to look at! As the London Family History Centre is currently located there, it means that everything I need including parish record microfilms can be found in one place, which is very useful in some ways but also means that I'm certain to have a busy day, and that I may well come away with some things not accomplished.

Here's what I'm planning to look at (so far - the list may grow by next week):

  • parish records (on microfilm) for various parishes in Kent, Berkshire and North Yorkshire
  • 18th century muster rolls for 4 different army regiments
  • other regimental 18th century records - I'll be seeking some advice there about exactly what is available and whether it will be of use to me for what I need
  • conveyance of land in Yorkshire in the 18th century for charitable purposes

I think that last one will be the most interesting!


I'm a professional genealogist based in the UK, near London. That means that I can easily travel to the National Archives at Kew (TNA) and many of the other archives, record offices and libraries that are in and around London.

Many of the records that we are all familiar with (birth, marriage and death indexes, census returns and so on) are available online and I use those for research too. But sooner or later you come to the end of the line in terms of online records, and that's when a look at the original documents (or at the very least a paper or microfilm copy) is essential.

For example on my last visit to TNA I was looking up records of an Army officer in the eighteenth century. The records I needed were regimental muster rolls, which have never been indexed or copied. The only way you can read them is to open up the dusty archive box, untie the string or tape that by the look of it was last untied about 100 years ago, and carefully unfold parchment sheets about 3 feet (1 metre square), covered in eighteenth century handwriting. And that's just the start - there are hundreds of names on each sheet to be deciphered, and you may need to go through 10 or 20 sheets before you find the person you are looking for - if you find him/her!

Luckily for me (and my client) I found what I was looking for, and some hours later, somewhat dusty but triumphant, I emerged from the building clutching my trusty digital camera containing photos of the document I had found. In this case it was vital that I had an idea of which document might contain the information I needed, and where to look for it - that isn't always straightforward and it's one of the reasons you might consider using a professional researcher in your family history quest. Frequently the information isn't quite where you might expect it to be, and I think one of the most important talents for any genealogist is to be able to think "outside the box" - the archive box of course!

Blogger Template by Blogcrowds